'Theories of Freud and Rogers'

'Among the greatest theorists in recent write up argon Carl Rogers and Sigmund Freud. both(prenominal) made advancements in psychology with theories reinforced upon clinical induction and experience (Goodwin, 2005). unconstipated though both theories were advanced everyplace countless days of question and clinical experience, each is ground on several(predicate) assumptions (Goodwin, 2005). The concept of forgiving race nature and the case in the rule behind human motivation are diametrically debate in these theories (Goodwin, 2005).\n\n phrase One\nFreuds psychoanalytic speculation comes from clinical look for instead of the testing ground research. This has led to the culture of a divinatory perspective chiefly foc employ on case visible and idiographic selective information for testing psychoanalytic hypotheses (Bornstein, 2007). The foundation for evaluating these ideas is referred to as nomothetic depth psychology and complements the traditional idiographi c approach. This word provides guidelines used when piloting nomothetic studies of psychodynamic constructs (Bornstein, 2007). To be prospered in the performance of nomothetic analytic thinking it will bespeak not only develop relentless methods for testing psychodynamic hypotheses provided also a way to present tense nomothetic research findings to obtain borrowing within the psychoanalytic community (Bornstein, 2007). The oblige provides an over medical prognosis of five step to make nomothetic studies valuable in a clinical setting (Bornstein, 2007).\n\n oblige Two\nRogers and new(prenominal) humanist psychologists attend to prefer soft more than valued methods and positive psychologists favor the reverse (Friedman, 2008). This article provides a hitch on humanistic psychology and the quantitative research traditions. Rogers never abandoned his consignment to empirical scholarship even though he opened up his view (Friedman, 2008). Some of the pertinent con cepts for Rogers involved nomothetic and idiographic methods and existential versus spectator knowledge. Rogers held the... '