Case: R vs Keilty

R.V. Keilty In the theatrical role R.v.Keilty the impeach, Keilty, was charged and hustleed of trafficking in narcotics. He then appealed to the unconditional Court of Canada on the grounds that the discharge judge erred in justice. The facts in the fictional character were non disputed that the real definition of self-denial under particle 2 of the somniferous Control scrap was the issue. The appellate neer in truth did get by the narcotics nor did he at anytime own ownership. It is illogical to convict a person of possession when they dont really have possession as defined in the immoral Code. Therefore is it logical to convict a person of trafficking if there were no narcotics? Crown arguments         The actual possession is irrelevant because section 2 of the Narcotic Control Act states that trafficking means: (a) to manufacture, sell, give, administer, transport, send, deliver, or distribute, or (b) offer to do anything referred to in paragraph (a) other than under the authority of this Act or the regulation The appellant obviously offered to sell the narcotics to the officer and as in R.v.Mancuso he should be found guilty. Also the actual physical possession is not necessarily needed to be proven as was in R.v.Russo where the defendant was convicted of possession and trafficking even though he did not posses at any time the narcotics. In the case R.v.

Piscopo it was demonstrated that an accuse can be convicted upon circumstantial evidence. The accused can be convicted using all of the aforementioned cases. another(prenominal) issue is that i f this case becomes precedent it would open ! a floodgate or loophole in the law where other criminals may escape through. This would dispense with for more redoubted dealers of narcotics, who operate their business long distance to escape prosecution because they never actually had the narcotics in their possession. If you want to get a upright essay, point it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay